Cited by 194Social Power and Status DynamicsTeam Dynamics and PerformanceGender Diversity and Inequality

Status Processes in Enduring Work Groups

Cohen, Bernard P., Zhou, Xueguang·1991·American Sociological Review

Abstract

We examine the impact of team, organizational, and societal status characteristics on interaction patterns in long-term work groups. Data are from 2077 respondents representing 224 research and development teams drawn from 29 large corporations. Hypotheses based on status characteristic theory are supported: Both external (organizational and societal) and internal (team) status characteristics affect team interaction. When status within a team is controlled, only one external characteristic has a significant positive effect. Team status, in turn, is significantly affected by each of the external characteristics studied. While most of these external characteristics may reflect a team member's past performance, gender, when past performance is controlled, also has an independent effect on team status with males being accorded higher status. This suggests that competence and performance are not the sole bases for team status. Status processes in enduring work teams behave very much like those observed in ad hoc groups: Beliefs associated with diffuse status characteristics affect the ordering of interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2095778

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Authors
Cohen, B. P., & Zhou, X.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1991-04
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
179
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066946464
Cited by
194
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
status characteristics, R&D teams, past performance, organizational status, ad hoc groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review