Status Processes in Enduring Work Groups
Abstract
We examine the impact of team, organizational, and societal status characteristics on interaction patterns in long-term work groups. Data are from 2077 respondents representing 224 research and development teams drawn from 29 large corporations. Hypotheses based on status characteristic theory are supported: Both external (organizational and societal) and internal (team) status characteristics affect team interaction. When status within a team is controlled, only one external characteristic has a significant positive effect. Team status, in turn, is significantly affected by each of the external characteristics studied. While most of these external characteristics may reflect a team member's past performance, gender, when past performance is controlled, also has an independent effect on team status with males being accorded higher status. This suggests that competence and performance are not the sole bases for team status. Status processes in enduring work teams behave very much like those observed in ad hoc groups: Beliefs associated with diffuse status characteristics affect the ordering of interaction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective
Bunderson, J. S. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556637 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Kensbock, J. M., & Peschl, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21981 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cohen, B. P., & Zhou, X.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Zhou, Xueguang
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066946464
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- status characteristics, R&D teams, past performance, organizational status, ad hoc groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review