The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households
Abstract
Although much recent research has explored the division of household labor between husbands and wives, few studies have examined housework patterns across marital statuses. This paper uses data from the National Survey of Families and Households to analyze differences in time spent on housework by men and women in six different living situations: never married and living with parents, never married and living independently, cohabiting, married, divorced, and widowed. In all situations, women spend more time than men doing housework, but the gender gap is widest among married persons. The time women spend doing housework is higher among cohabitants than among the never-married, is highest in marriage, and is lower among divorcees and widows. Men's housework time is very similar across both never-married living situations, in cohabitation, and in marriage. However, divorced and widowed men do substantially more housework than any other group of men, and they are especially more likely than their married counterparts to spend more time cooking and cleaning. In addition to gender and marital status, housework time is affected significantly by several indicators of workload (e.g., number of children, home ownership) and time devoted to nonhousehold activities (e.g., paid employment, school enrollment)-most of these variables have greater effects on women's housework time than on men's. An adult son living at home increases women's housework, whereas an adult daughter at home reduces housework for women and men. These housework patterns are generally consistent with an emerging perspective that views housework as a symbolic enactment of gender relations. We discuss the implications of these findings for perceptions of marital equity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Cited by
Costs and Rewards of Children: The Effects of Becoming a Parent on Adults' Lives
Nomaguchi, K. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00356.x · Cited by 679
Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark
Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00769.x · Cited by 459
Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming
Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2 · Cited by 245
Lips, H. M. (2013) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0165-z · Cited by 203
The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in germany
Cooke, L. P. (2004) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00090.x · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- South, S. J., & Spitze, G.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085278998
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.