Cited by 134Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsCognitive Abilities and Testing

Family of Origin and Cohort Differences in Verbal Ability

Alwin, Duane F.·1991·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Do birth-cohort differences in family configuration brought about by post-World War II increases infertility explain declines in verbal test scores of young people in the 1960s and 1970s? Datafrom nine representative samples of the U.S. population in the General Social Survey data file confirm systematic declines in verbal scores for cohorts born in the postWorld War II era, but reveal a trend beginning much earlier, at least with cohorts born prior to 1920, and one sustained through cohorts born in the 1960s. Despite the significance of these intercohort patterns, within-cohort factors are much more important in producing variation in verbal scores. Social and economic characteristics of the respondent'sfamily of origin and amount of schooling are associated with the largest differences in vocabulary knowledge. Sibship size has a significant influence on the development of verbal skills, but is relatively less important than other family background factors. Birth order, however, is not independently linked to verbal scores. Finally, owing in part to the relatively weak role of family configuration in producing variation in verbal scores, there is no support for the hypothesis that cohort differences in family experiences account for the trends in verbal ability across cohorts in the U.S. population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The negative cohort effects on verbal ability reported by Alwin may be due to confusing cohort effects with aging, treating the relationship between age and verbal ability as linear rather than curvilinear.

    “The negative cohort effects on verbal ability reported by Alwin (1991) may be due to confusing cohort effects with aging, treating the relationship between age and verbal ability as linear rather than curvilinear (Wilson & Gove, 1999).”

    From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Alwin (1991)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alwin, D. F.
Corresponding author
Alwin, Duane F.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1991-10
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
625
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002348562
Cited by
134
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
verbal ability, family of origin, birth cohort differences, family configurations, infertility, number of siblings, birth order, vocabulary knowledge, educational attainment, intergenerational transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review