Organizational Evolution and the Social Ecology of Jobs
Abstract
The persistence of organizational routines is studied by examining the survival offormalized jobs. Basic models of evolutionary change predict that organizational context, job-founding processes, and whether a is novel affect survival. Negotiated order and social interaction theories predict, however, that the relationship of the jobholder to the organization and to the duties should also affect the persistence offormalized jobs, e.g., the initial incumbent's familiarity to the hiring department and whether the was tailored to a specific person. These predictions are analyzed using partial likelihood analysis of the hazard rate of job death among 347 formalized jobs in a large organization over roughly a sixyear period. Results support most of the predictions. The findings suggest that organizational evolution should be examined through systematic study of organizational routines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endogenous change has been observed but has been difficult to explain.
“Endogenous change has been observed (e.g., Miner and Estler, 1985; Miner, 1991; Burgelman, 1994; Feldman, 2000), but it has been difficult to explain.”
From Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003) · cites this paper as Miner, 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change
Feldman, M. S. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529 · Cited by 1,969 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miner, A. S.
- Corresponding author
- Miner, Anne S.
- ORCID
- Miner, Anne S.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 772
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325712416
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- organizational routines, job persistence, organizational evolution, negotiated order, social interaction theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review