Cited by 121Management and Organizational StudiesManagement Theory and PracticeEconomic Theory and Institutions

Organizational Evolution and the Social Ecology of Jobs

Miner, Anne S.·1991·American Sociological Review

Abstract

The persistence of organizational routines is studied by examining the survival offormalized jobs. Basic models of evolutionary change predict that organizational context, job-founding processes, and whether a is novel affect survival. Negotiated order and social interaction theories predict, however, that the relationship of the jobholder to the organization and to the duties should also affect the persistence offormalized jobs, e.g., the initial incumbent's familiarity to the hiring department and whether the was tailored to a specific person. These predictions are analyzed using partial likelihood analysis of the hazard rate of job death among 347 formalized jobs in a large organization over roughly a sixyear period. Results support most of the predictions. The findings suggest that organizational evolution should be examined through systematic study of organizational routines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096255

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miner, A. S.
Corresponding author
Miner, Anne S.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1991-12
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
772
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325712416
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
organizational routines, job persistence, organizational evolution, negotiated order, social interaction theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review