Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 819

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion

Lawler, Edward J., Yoon, Jeongkoo·1996·American Sociological Review
DOI 10.2307/2096408
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Les AA. proposent un modele d'evaluation de la theorie de la cohesion relationnelle. Celle-ci permet de predire comment et quand les individus dans le cadre des echanges se sentent engages dans le jeu relationnel. Celle-ci met en avant une conception dyadique de ce type de relation sociale et affirme qu'une situation percue de plus grande egalite de pouvoir stimule des echanges concus positivement et induit une perception de la relation concue comme une unite coherente

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096408

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 819

Metadata

Authors
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1996-02
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
89
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/2096408
OpenAlex
W2043876105
Cited by
819
References
47
FWCI
40.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096408
The paper
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.