The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Gender Gap in Workplace Authority: A Cross-National Study
Open accessAbstract
We explore a range of issues concerning the gender gap in workplace authority in seven countries (the United Stares, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Sweden, Norway and Japan). There are six main empirical conclusions. First, there is considerable cross-national variation in the gender gap in authority: The gap is lowest in the four English-speaking countries (especially the United States and Australia) and highest in Japan. Second, the gender gap in authority within countries and the pattern of cross-national variation do not appear to be the result of gender differences in personal attributes or employment settings. Third, the self-selection hypothesis (that women choose nor to seek authority because of family responsibilities) does not appear to account for much of the gender gap in authority, except perhaps in Canada. Fourth, we find little support for the ''glass-ceiling'' hypothesis that barriers to upward promotions for women in authority hierarchies are greater than the barriers they face in getting into hierarchies in the first place. Fifth, in the United States the barriers faced by women already in hierarchies are weaker than in other countries, and probably weaker than the barriers they faced to enter hierarchies in the first place. Finally we find suggestive evidence that these variations across countries in the gender gap in authority are explained by the interaction between the availability of managerial positions and the capacity of politically organized women's movements to challenge barriers to women gaining authority in the workplace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Cited by
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0091 · Cited by 894
Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?
Albrecht, J., Björklund, A., & Vroman, S. (2003) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/344126 · Cited by 894
Why Not Ascription? Organizations' Employment of Male and Female Managers
Reskin, B. F., & McBrier, D. B. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657438 · Cited by 501
Borrell, C., Muntaner, C., Benach, J., & Artazcoz, L. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00408-8 · Cited by 314
Depression in the United States and Japan: Gender, marital status, and SES patterns
Inaba, A., Thoits, P. A., Ueno, K., Gove, W. R., Evenson, R. J., & Sloan, M. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.014 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, E. O., Baxter, J., & Birkelund, G. E.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980944790
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gender Gap in Workplace Authority: A Cross-National Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096422
- The paper
- Wright, E. O., Baxter, J., & Birkelund, G. E. (1995). The Gender Gap in Workplace Authority: A Cross-National Study. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.