The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
A Study of Spinoza's Ethics
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Yet, most recent commentators have viewed the demonstration of IIIP6 with skepticism.”
From Spinozas Metaphysics of Desire (2004) · cites this paper as Bennett 1984
In the citing paper
“It is interesting to note that while all three of these commentators agree that both the justification depends mainly on the second stage of the demonstration and that the deduction is invalid, they do not agree on which parts of the second stage are important.”
From Spinozas Metaphysics of Desire (2004) · cites this paper as Bennett 1984
In the citing paper
“As Jonathan Bennett has argued, stated in this way, Spinoza's explanation makes no sense.”
From Spinozas Metaphysics of Desire (2004) · cites this paper as Bennett 1984
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spinozas Metaphysics of Desire
LIN, M. (2004) · Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie · doi:10.1515/agph.2004.003 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Ariew, R., & Bennett, J.
- Venue
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649
- ISSN
- 0031-8205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198359594
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Keywords
- Spinoza, Spinoza's Ethics, ethical philosophy, metaphysics and ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2107234
- The paper
- Ariew, R., & Bennett, J. (1987). A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107234
