Cited by 87Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesEvaluation and Performance AssessmentOptimal Experimental Design Methods

Randomization as an Instrumental Variable

Heckman, James J.·1996·The Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

This paper discusses how randomized social experiments operate as an instrumental variable. For two types of randomization schemes, the fundamental experimental estimation equations are derived from the principle that experiments equate bias in control and experimental samples. Using conventional econometric representations, we derive the orthogonality conditions for the fundamental estimation equations. Randomization is a multiple instrumental variable in the sense that one randomization defines the parameter of interest expressed as a function of multiple endogenous variables in the conventional usage of that term. It orthogonalizes the treatment variable simultaneously with respect to the other regressors in the model and the disturbance term for the conditional population. However, conventional `structural' parameters are not in general identified by the two types of randomization schemes widely used in practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2109936

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heckman, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Heckman, James J.
Venue
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-05
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
336
ISSN
0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1863222473
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Keywords
randomization, instrumental variables, moment conditions, endogeneity, treatment effect estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review