Randomization as an Instrumental Variable
Abstract
This paper discusses how randomized social experiments operate as an instrumental variable. For two types of randomization schemes, the fundamental experimental estimation equations are derived from the principle that experiments equate bias in control and experimental samples. Using conventional econometric representations, we derive the orthogonality conditions for the fundamental estimation equations. Randomization is a multiple instrumental variable in the sense that one randomization defines the parameter of interest expressed as a function of multiple endogenous variables in the conventional usage of that term. It orthogonalizes the treatment variable simultaneously with respect to the other regressors in the model and the disturbance term for the conditional population. However, conventional `structural' parameters are not in general identified by the two types of randomization schemes widely used in practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Instrumental variable methods address selective exposure to an intervention by replacing a confounded direct measure of exposure with an unconfounded proxy measure, akin to treatment assignment in an RCT.
“IV methods address selective exposure to an intervention by replacing a confounded direct measure of exposure with an unconfounded proxy measure, akin to treatment assignment in an RCT (33).”
From Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ESTIMATION OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM OBSERVATIONAL DATA
Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (1999) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.659 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Craig, P., Katikireddi, S. V., Leyland, A., & Popham, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Asarnow, J. R., Baraff, L. J., Berk, M., Grob, C. S., Devich-Navarro, M., Suddath, R., Piacentini, J. C., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Cohen, D., & Tang, L. (2011) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.62.11.pss6211_1303 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heckman, J. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Heckman, James J.
- ORCID
- Heckman, James J.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 336
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1863222473
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Keywords
- randomization, instrumental variables, moment conditions, endogeneity, treatment effect estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review