The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The New Racism
Abstract
This study combines the methodological advantages of a fully experimental design and a genuinely representative survey sample to explore the nature and workings of contemporary racial prejudice. The correlational results both replicate and extend the findings of earlier work. Political conservatism, for example, was found once again to be correlated with opposition to policies to assist blacks and with support for negative images of blacks as lazy and irresponsible. The experimental results, however, pose fundamental challenges to symbolic and modem racism theories, which contend that there is a new kind of racism in America that takes the form of racial prejudice plus traditional, conservative values. The experimental results demonstrate, on the one hand, that conservatives are not more likely to refuse government help to blacks who have violated traditional values; on the other hand, the results demonstrate that conservatives are more likely to favor government help for blacks who have acted in accord with traditional values. The experimental results, moreover, identify a key condition for the expression of discrimination-a focus on group rather than individual claimants-and demonstrate that discrimination is not encouraged by a particular ideological outlook, conservative or liberal, but rather is most common in the absence of any ideological stance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research
Foschi, M. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21 · Cited by 599
Wright, M., Levy, M., & Citrin, J. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9311-y · Cited by 180
Is Love Colorblind? Political Orientation and Interracial Romantic Desire
Eastwick, P. W., Richeson, J. A., Son, D., & Finkel, E. J. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209338524 · Cited by 62
Williams, D. R., Jackson, J. S., Brown, T. N., Torres, M., Forman, T. A., & Brown, K. (1999) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3097073 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Sniderman, P. M., Piazza, T., Tetlock, P. E., & Kendrick, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 423
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315357674
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Racism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2111369
- The paper
- Sniderman, P. M., Piazza, T., Tetlock, P. E., & Kendrick, A. (1991). The New Racism. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.