The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values
Abstract
R. Michael Alvarez, John Brehm, American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Nov., 1995), pp. 1055-1082
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
Marquart, F., & Naderer, B. (2016) · Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20 · Cited by 4,993
Qualitative Response Models: A Survey
Amemiya, T. (1994) · Studies in Econometric Theory · doi:10.4337/9781035362707.00034 · Cited by 1,971
A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111583 · Cited by 1,609
Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values
Feldman, S. (1988) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111130 · Cited by 1,085
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1955648 · Cited by 968
Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity
Harvey, A. C. (1976) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913974 · Cited by 951
Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood
Luker, K. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520907928 · Cited by 920
The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State
Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111433 · Cited by 762
Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response
Achen, C. H. (1975) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1955282 · Cited by 751
Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference
King, G. (1989) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 710
Cited by
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
Issue Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion
Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647553 · Cited by 486
Collective preferences in democratic politics: opinion surveys and the will of the people
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1221 · Cited by 274
The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790638 · Cited by 242
Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information
Lavine, H., Lodge, M., & Freitas, K. (2005) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00416.x · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1055
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330339681
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2111669
- The paper
- Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1995). American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
