Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations

Clifford, Margaret M., Walster, Elaine·1973·Sociology of Education

Abstract

Rosenthal and Jacobson found that a teacher's expectations about a child's behavior strongly influence his actual behavior. Generally, teachers form their first impressions of children, and thus develop their expectations for them, from two sources of information-the children's school record and their physical appearance. In this experiment, teachers were given objective information, presumably about a child's scholastic and social potential, ac- companied by a photograph of an attractive or an unattractive boy or girl. It was found that the child's attractiveness was significantly associated with the teacher's expectations about how intelligent the child was, how interested in education his parents were, how far he was likely to progress in school, and how popular he would be with his peers. ROSENTHAL AND JACOBSON (1968) argue that a teacher's expecta- tions as to how a child will behave have an enormous impact on how the child does behave. To prove this assertion, they con- ducted an experiment in a public elementary school. They gave students a standard IQ test, telling the teachers that this test mea- sured blooming. The researchers chose 20 per cent of the children at random, and informed their teachers that the test had identified them as very special children who would bloom (show a marked intellectual spurt) within the next year. One year after this deception, the same IQ test was again administered to all children. The results revealed -that the teachers' expectations did in- deed have an enormous impact on students' performance. The supposed bloomers showed far more improvement in IQ than did the other youngsters; gains were especially pronounced for the * This research was financed in part by NIMH Grant MH 1661, NSF Grant GS

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2112099

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E.
Venue
Sociology of Education
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1973
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
248
ISSN
0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994018871
Cited by
423
References
1
FWCI
16.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2112099
The paper
Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E. (1973). The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations. Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.