Effects of the beholder’s age on the perception of facial attractiveness
Abstract
Children have been shown to prefer faces rated as highly attractive by adults over faces rated as quite unattractive. We investigated to what extent this agreement holds not only for the general direction of preferences but for preference strengths as well. In a choice experiment, we presented 40 nine-year-old girls and their mothers and 40 twelve-year-old girls and their mothers with pairs of women's and girls' faces and asked the subjects to pick the face that appeared prettier to them. Preference frequencies and simple attractiveness scales derived from these preference frequencies by fitting the Bradley-Terry-Luce rule (Luce, D. R. (1959). Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley) were compared across subject groups. For the women's faces, we found no difference in preferences between nine-year-olds, twelve-year-olds, and adults, neither in direction nor in strength. For the girls' faces, we also found no major differences in preference direction, however, we did find reliable differences in preference strengths. To a considerable part these differences were due to the fact that the children showed less pronounced preferences between face stimuli than the adults. These results suggest a role of developmental factors in the perception of facial attractiveness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In terms of perceived attractiveness, both before and after beautification young individuals were rated as significantly more attractive than middle-aged and older individuals.
“In terms of perceived attractiveness, both before and after beautification young individuals were rated as significantly more attractive than middle-aged and older individuals, in accordance with prior work [64–66].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
The perceived age of the stimulus is negatively correlated with perceived attractiveness both before and after beautification (p<0.001).
“Regarding attractiveness, the perceived age of the stimulus (β3) is negatively correlated (p<0.001) both before and after beautification, as has been extensively reported in the literature [64–66].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Visual Following and Pattern Discrimination of Face-like Stimuli by Newborn Infants
Goren, C. C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P. Y. K. (1975) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.56.4.544 · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
The method of paired comparisons for social values.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0065439 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies
Kissler, J., Assadollahi, R., & Herbert, C. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56008-x · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kissler, J., & Bäuml, K.-H.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- University of Regensburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kissler, Johanna
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-166
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068621780
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- facial attractiveness, face perception, age differences, children, developmental differences, preference strength, Bradley-Terry-Luce model, face preference
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Beauty, Child, Child Development, Face, Female, Humans, Judgment, Social Desirability, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review