The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality
Abstract
Marxian class categories have been almost totally ignored in systematic quantitative studies of social stratification and income inequality.Occupational status or a similar variable is almost always used as the core criterion defining the individual's position in the system of stratification.This study provides a preliminary operationalization of the Marxian class categories for use in quantitative research.The three most important of these classes-workers, managers and employers-then are analyzed to see what interactions occur between class position and the usual variables used in predicting income (education, occupational status, age and job tenure) and between class and race-sex categories.It was found that there is a substanial interaction between class position and the income returns to education; within class categories, however, there are no differences between race and sex groups in the returns to education.In the study of social stratification, there is a major disjuncture between theoretical traditions and quantitative empirical work.Of all the theoretical traditions in sociology, social inequality probably plays the most central role in the Marxist perspective.Yet, quantitative investigations of the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Kline, J. V., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1115736 · Cited by 7,361
The American Occupational Structure.
Blalock, H. M., Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D., & Tyree, A. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092399 · Cited by 4,412
Elements of Econometrics: Second Edition
Kmenta, J. (1997) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.15701 · Cited by 3,221
The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society
Bell, D. (1976) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131727609336501 · Cited by 2,777
The Coming of Post-Industrial Society
Schroyer, T. (1974) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0374019162 · Cited by 2,772
Galbraith, J. K. (2007) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400873180 · Cited by 2,595
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Isaacs, N., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/791311 · Cited by 1,954
The American Occupational Structure.
Hansen, W. L., Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D., & Tyree, A. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092400 · Cited by 1,684
Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society.
Mayer, K. B., & Dahrendorf, R. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092642 · Cited by 1,456
Wickens, M. R., & Kmenta, J. (1972) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2552662 · Cited by 1,382
Cited by
The Attitude-Achievement Paradox Among Black Adolescents
Mickelson, R. A. (1990) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.2307/2112896 · Cited by 991
Racial and gender discrimination: risk factors for high blood pressure?
Krieger, N. (1990) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90307-e · Cited by 929
Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology
Hedstrom, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488801 · Cited by 816
(2005) · Cited by 772
Wealth and Stratification Processes
Spilerman, S. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.497 · Cited by 457
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, E. O., & Perrone, L.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136505683
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 91.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2117730
- The paper
- Wright, E. O., & Perrone, L. (1977). Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.