The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Attitude-Achievement Paradox Among Black Adolescents
Abstract
Many black youths and adults express a high regard for education even though their academic performance is poor. Utilizing a sample of 1,193 high school seniors, this article resolves the attitude-achievement paradox by demonstrating that attitudes toward education are multidimensional. The first dimension is composed of abstract attitudes that reflect the dominant ideology. The second dimension is composed of concrete attitudes that inform achievement behavior. Unlike abstract attitudes, these concrete attitudes are rooted in life experience in which educational credentials may not be fairly rewarded by the opportunity structure. The paradox of poor grades but positive attitudes toward education among blacks vanishes when concrete, rather than abstract, attitudes are related to high school grades. Substantively, the study reported in this article illustrates how race and class, which are large components of the social context of achievement, influence school outcomes. Education has had a special place in the hearts and minds of black Americans since the era of Reconstruction. Although public schooling was not widely available until over 100 years after the demise of slavery, blacks held fast to their faith in education as one of the few institutions that could lift them from poverty and oppression. Even so, the rhetorical importance that blacks place on education has rarely been matched by their scholastic performance. This research examines an important issue in the education of blacks, specifically the paradox of consistently positive attitudes toward education, coupled with frequently poor academic achievement. In his 1966 report, Coleman and his colleagues noted that black students held highly favorable attitudes toward education irrespective of their performance: Negroes . . . give a picture of students who report high interest in academic achievement, but whose
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
- STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES
(2014) · Statistical Methods in Psychiatry Research and SPSS · doi:10.1201/b17560-26 · Cited by 12,056
How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement
Jensen, A. (1969) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 · Cited by 2,907
Equality of Educational Opportunity.
Sewell, W. H., Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091094 · Cited by 2,753
A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences
Weiner, B. (1979) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3 · Cited by 2,453
Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291366 · Cited by 2,051
Rotter, J. B. (1975) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076301 · Cited by 1,730
LaPiere, R. T. (1934) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2570339 · Cited by 1,720
The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process
Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092789 · Cited by 1,535
Locus of control in personality
Phares, E. J. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,120
Cited by
FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY*
AGNEW, R. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x · Cited by 5,046
Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment
Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019 · Cited by 1,386
Ogbu, J. U., & Simons, H. D. (1998) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.1998.29.2.155 · Cited by 1,272
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100611418056 · Cited by 1,269
Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter?
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5 · Cited by 1,139
Metadata
- Authors
- Mickelson, R. A.
- Venue
- Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44
- ISSN
- 0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977554162
- Cited by
- 991
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 36.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Attitude-Achievement Paradox Among Black Adolescents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2112896
- The paper
- Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The Attitude-Achievement Paradox Among Black Adolescents. Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.