Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ethnic Capital and Intergenerational Mobility

Borjas, G. J.·1992·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

This paper analyzes the extent to which ethnic skill differentials are transmitted across generations. I assume that ethnicity acts as an externality in the human capital accumulation process. The skills of the next generation depend on parental inputs and on the quality of the ethnic environment in which parents make their investments, or “ethnic capital.” The empirical evidence reveals that the skills of today's generation depend not only on the skills of their parents, but also on the average skills of the ethnic group in the parent's generation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2118325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A parsimonious theory-that children's outcomes mimic those of the parents in their social communities, as in Borjas (1992)-explains the divergent trends in economic mobility by race and class in the United States in recent decades.

    “Combining these results, we conclude that a parsimonious theory-that children's outcomes mimic those of the parents in their social communities, as in Borjas (1992)-explains the divergent trends in eco-nomic mobility by race and class in the United States in recent decades.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Borjas, G. J.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1992-02-01
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
123-150
ISSN
  • 0033-5533
  • 1531-4650
Cited by
579
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review