The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reducing the Risk: Impact of a New Curriculum on Sexual Risk-Taking
Abstract
Reducing the Risk is a new sexuality education curriculum, based on social learning theory, social inoculation theory and cognitive-behavioral theory and employing explicit norms against unprotected sexual intercourse. In a quasi-experimental evaluation, this curriculum was implemented at 13 California high schools; 758 high school students assigned to treatment and control groups were surveyed before their exposure to the curriculum, immediately afterwards, six months later, and 18 months later. Among all participants, the program significantly increased participants' knowledge and parent-child communication about abstinence and contraception. Among students who had not initiated intercourse prior to the pretest, the curriculum significantly reduced the likelihood that they would have had intercourse by 18 months later. Reducing the Risk did not significantly affect frequency of sexual intercourse or use of birth control among sexually experienced students. Among all lower risk youths and among all students who had not initiated intercourse prior to their exposure to the curriculum, the curriculum appears to have significantly reduced unprotected intercourse, either by delaying the onset of intercourse, either by delaying the onset of intercourse or by increasing the use of contraceptives. Among the students not sexually active before participation in the program, effects seem to have extended across a variety of subgroups, including both whites and Latinos and lower risk and higher risk youths, but were particularly strong among lower risk youths and females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs.
Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., & Davino, K. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.6-7.449 · Cited by 1,189
Kirby, D. B., Laris, B. A., & Rolleri, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.143 · Cited by 915
Self-citationKirby, D. B. (2008) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1525/srsp.2008.5.3.18 · Cited by 410
Self-citationRohrbach (2006) · doi:10.1177/0163278706290408 · Cited by 300
Metzler, C. W., Biglan, A., Noell, J., Ary, D. V., & Ochs, L. (2000) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(00)80003-9 · Cited by 79
Sherman, A. C., Mosier, J., Leszcz, M., Burlingame, G. M., Ulman, K. H., Cleary, T., Simonton, S., Latif, U., Hazelton, L., & Strauss, B. (2004) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1521/ijgp.54.1.29.40376 · Cited by 45
HIV preventive interventions for adolescents: A look back and ahead
Malow, R. M., Kershaw, T., Sipsma, H., Rosenberg, R., & Dévieux, J. G. (2007) · Current HIV/AIDS Reports · doi:10.1007/s11904-007-0025-6 · Cited by 41
The Role of Parents and Families in Teen Pregnancy Prevention: An Analysis of Programs and Policies
Silk, J., & Romero, D. (2014) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x13481330 · Cited by 37
Estrada, Y., Rosen, A., Huang, S., Tapia, M., Sutton, M., Willis, L., Quevedo, A., Condo, C., Vidot, D. C., Pantin, H., et al. (2015) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.07.006 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirby, D., Barth, R. P., Leland, N., & Fetro, J. V.
- Venue
- Family Planning Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 253
- ISSN
- 0014-7354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173404429
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.