Cited by 1,189Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and InterventionsYouth Development and Social Support

What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs.

Nation, Maury, Crusto, Cindy, Wandersman, Abraham, Kumpfer, Karol L., Seybolt, Diana, Morrissey-Kane, Erin, Davino, Katrina·2003·American Psychologist

Abstract

The high prevalence of drug abuse, delinquency, youth violence, and other youth problems creates a need to identify and disseminate effective prevention strategies. General principles gleaned from effective interventions may help prevention practitioners select, modify, or create more effective programs. Using a review-of-reviews approach across 4 areas (substance abuse, risky sexual behavior, school failure, and juvenile delinquency and violence), the authors identified 9 characteristics that were consistently associated with effective prevention programs: Programs were comprehensive, included varied teaching methods, provided sufficient dosage, were theory driven, provided opportunities for positive relationships, were appropriately timed, were socioculturally relevant, included outcome evaluation, and involved well-trained staff. This synthesis can inform the planning and implementation of problem-specific prevention interventions, provide a rationale for multi-problem prevention programs, and serve as a basis for further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.58.6-7.449

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., & Davino, K.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2003-06
Volume
58
Issue
6-7
Pages
449-456
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2016317357
Cited by
1,189
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 68
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
prevention programs, substance use prevention, sexual risk behavior, school failure, juvenile delinquency, youth violence, program dosage, theory-based intervention, positive relationships, outcome measurement, employee training, umbrella review
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Care Team, Preventive Health Services, Social Problems, United States, Violence, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review