The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuing the Search for a Law of Mortality
Abstract
Scientists have long attempted to explain why closely similar age patterns of death are characteristic of highly diverse human and nonhuman populations. Historical efforts to identify a general "law of mortality" from these patterns that applied across species ended in 1935 when it was declared that such a law did not exist. These early efforts were conducted using mortality curves based on all causes of death. The authors predict that if comparisons of mortality are based instead on "intrinsic" causes of death (i.e., deaths that reflect the basic biology of the organism), then age patterns of mortality consistent with the historical concept of a law might be revealed. Using data on laboratory animals and humans, they demonstrate that age patterns of intrinsic mortality overlap when graphed on a biologically comparable time scale. These results are consistent with the existence of a law of mortality following sexual maturity, as originally asserted by Benjamin Gompertz and Raymond Pearl. The societal, medical, and research implications of such a law are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Once normalized for time, mortality schedules of species should overlap, revealing a common mortality pattern and a predicted maximum life span for each species.
“Once normalized for time, these mortality schedules should, according to evolutionary theory (34), overlap-revealing a common mortality pattern and a predicted maximum life span for each species.”
From Inconvenient Truths About Human Longevity (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Gompertz, B. (1825) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1825.0026 · Cited by 3,816
Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity
Fries, J. F. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198007173030304 · Cited by 3,356
On the nature of the aging process
Szilard, L. (1959) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.45.1.30 · Cited by 651
In Search of Methuselah: Estimating the Upper Limits to Human Longevity
Olshansky, S. J., Carnes, B. A., & Cassel, C. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2237414 · Cited by 645
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inconvenient Truths About Human Longevity
Olshansky, S. J., & Carnes, B. A. (2019) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glz098 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carnes, B. A., Olshansky, S. J., & Grahn, D.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231
- ISSN
- 0098-7921
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review