The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fertility, Dimensions of Patriarchy, and Development in India
Abstract
This study examines the relative importance of the marriage system the means of active discrimination against women and womens economic value in a patriarchal system in affecting the total fertility rate (TFR) for 358 districts in India. Data were obtained from the Development District Database from the 1981 Census of India. TFR was adjusted for undercounts based on the methods of Bhat Preston and Dyson. Regional diversity in fertility was expected to vary with levels of economic and social development and gender biases in kinship structure. Women in the south and to some extent in the east were better off and had greater female autonomy. Womens status measures reveal that female sex ratios of mortality exceeded 1.00 in over 60% of districts and that over 50% of girls were married at 15-19 years in over 50% of districts. Literacy and labor force participation approach equity in only 6% of districts. In general the north-south pattern of womens status and TFR held. However some hill districts of the north had lower female sex ratios of child mortality and some south districts had a prevalence of early marriage. Womens status was more favorable in coastal areas. The 6 indicators did not mesh exactly geographically. The best fitting models included measures of social development and gender discrimination. Because of multicollinearity problems only 2 patriarchy measures were found to be statistically significant. In the full model the sex ratio of child mortality and female labor force had the most significant effects on fertility. Social measures of child mortality and literacy also have strong impacts on fertility. The proportion landless was the only social stratification factor that was significant and negative. Residence in the south and east had a negative impact. Patriarchy had a major influence on TFR by district was multidimensional and overlapped with other structural factors. Some patriarchy measures were virtually substitutable and others were independent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., & Riley, A. P. (1997) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00119-2 · Cited by 300
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Women's autonomy and its impact on fertility
Abadian, S. (1996) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(96)00075-7 · Cited by 148
The gendered experience with respect to health-seeking behaviour in an urban slum of Kolkata, India
Das, M., Angeli, F., Krumeich, A. J. S. M., & van Schayck, O. C. P. (2018) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-018-0738-8 · Cited by 125
Kanji, S., Carmichael, F., Darko, C., Egyei, R., & Vasilakos, N. (2024) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2023.2284678 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Malhotra, A., Vanneman, R., & Kishor, S.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107520414
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fertility, Dimensions of Patriarchy, and Development in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2137495
- The paper
- Malhotra, A., Vanneman, R., & Kishor, S. (1995). Fertility, Dimensions of Patriarchy, and Development in India. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.