The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Politics of the Revival of Infant Abandonment in China, with Special Reference to Hunan
Abstract
It is argued that abandonment of infant girls is severe in some regions and that abandonment results in death and the problem of girls. It is estimated that over 1 million girls are missing each year. There are many difficulties in accurately assessing the extent of abandonment. This article examines the problem of abandonment in Hunan province. Statistical data is supplemented by other documentary evidence. Abandonment of infant girls was widespread in Hunan and other parts of China prior to 1949. Orphanages were available from the late 17th century through the late 1930s. Historians reported that abandonment and infanticide declined significantly in Hunan from the 1950s through the early 1970s. The problem reappeared during the late 1970s after restrictive birth planning was introduced. Abandonment increased considerably by the late 1980s. During 1986-90 over 16000 children were brought to Hunan civil affairs departments as abandoned children. 92% were girls and many were only days old. 25% of the abandoned children were handicapped. Increased abandonment during 1986-90 followed a similar pattern in Hebei province. Hunans Civil Affairs Bureau (HCAB) reported a link between abandonment and birth planning campaigns. Abandonment is attributed by the state to feudal attitudes of peasants and not to central policy or son preference. The author asserts that the problem is related to layers of religious cultural and sometimes political factors supporting son preference and social…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Demographers have found an increasingly skewed Chinese gender ratio, which may result from female infanticide, parents' refusal to register daughters, parents' abandonment or lethal neglect of daughters, sex selection through selective abortion, or some combination of these factors (Arnold and Liu Zhaoxiang 1986;Coale and Banister 1994;Johnson 1996;Li Yongping and Peng Xizhe 2000;Zeng et al. 1993”
From China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters (2002) · cites this paper as Johnson 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
China's One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters
Fong, V. L. (2002) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1098 · Cited by 424
Gender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county
Li, J. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.041 · Cited by 117
Fresh winds in Beijing: Chinese feminists speak out on the one-child policy and women’s lives
Greenhalgh, S. (2001) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/495630 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K.
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Kay
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998372827
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Population and Development Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Keywords
- infant abandonment, female infanticide, son preference, family planning, orphanages, barriers to adoption, women's rights activism, Hunan Province, Hebei Province, gender discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review