The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Myth, Fantasy or Scholarship: Images of the Status of Women in Traditional China
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elsewhere in the Wushier bingfang, long-symptoms include difficulty urinating and feeling that the bladder is painfully puffy, close to what is described about long and shanjia in the Huangdi neijing.
“Elsewhere in this text it mentions long -symptoms such as the patient having difficulty in urinating and feeling that the bladder is painfully puffy, a symptom very close to what is described about long and shanjia in the Huangdi neijing .”
From Enchantment, Charming, and the Notion of the Femme Fatalein Early Chinese Historiography (2013) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enchantment, Charming, and the Notion of the Femme Fatalein Early Chinese Historiography
Zhang, H. (2013) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341317 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmgren, J.
- Corresponding author
- Holmgren, J.
- Venue
- The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 147-170
- ISSN
- 0156-7365 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2308891065
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- women's status, traditional China, gender roles, women in Chinese history, myths about women, historiography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
