The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root
Abstract
This paper derives the asymptotic power envelope for tests of a unit autoregressive root for various trend specifications and stationary Gaussian autoregressive disturbances. A family of tests is proposed, members of which are asymptotically similar under a general 1(1) null (allowing nonnormality and general dependence) and which achieve the Gaussian power envelope. One of these tests, which is asymptotically point optimal at a power of 50%, is found (numerically) to be approximately uniformly most powerful (UMP) in the case of a constant deterministic term, and approximately uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) in the case of a linear trend, although strictly no UMP or UMPI test exists. We also examine a modification, suggested by the expression for the power envelope, of the Dickey-Fuller (1979) t-statistic; this test is also found to be approximately UMP (constant deterministic term case) and UMPI (time trend case). The power improvement of both new tests is large: in the demeaned case, the Pitman efficiency of the proposed tests relative to the standard Dickey-Fuller t-test is 1.9 at a power of 50%. A Monte Carlo experiment indicates that both proposed tests, particularly the modified Dickey-Fuller t-test, exhibit good power and small size distortions in finite samples with dependent errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Unit root tests for panel data
Choi, I. (2001) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6 · Cited by 4,113
The economics of BitCoin price formation
Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, D. (2016) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1109038 · Cited by 1,004
Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand
Hughes, J. E., Knittel, C. R., & Sperling, D. (2008) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol29-no1-9 · Cited by 668
The effect of ICT development on economic growth and energy consumption in Japan
Ishida, H. (2015) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2014.04.003 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 813
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149292156
- Cited by
- 5,627
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2171846
- The paper
- Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.