The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.
Abstract
* Complex Equality * Membership * Security and Welfare * Money and Commodities * Office * Hard Work * Free Time * Education * Kinship and Love * Divine Grace * Recognition * Political Power * Tyrannies and Just Societies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens
Benhabib, S. (2004) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790799 · Cited by 2,180
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-0999 · Cited by 1,903
Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation
Lamont, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 · Cited by 1,492
Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction
Opotow, S. (1990) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x · Cited by 1,313
The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State
Torpey, J. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520990 · Cited by 1,005
Metadata
- Authors
- Daniels, N., & Walzer, M.
- Venue
- The Philosophical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142
- ISSN
- 0031-8108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3162901036
- Cited by
- 2,666
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2184729
- The paper
- Daniels, N., & Walzer, M. (1985). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. The Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
