The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State
Abstract
In order to distinguish between those who may and may not enter or leave, states everywhere have developed extensive systems of identification, central to which is the passport. This innovative book argues that documents such as passports, internal passports and related mechanisms have been crucial in making distinctions between citizens and non-citizens. It examines how the concept of citizenship has been used to delineate rights and penalties regarding property, liberty, taxes and welfare. It focuses on the US and Western Europe, moving from revolutionary France to the Napoleonic era, the American Civil War, the British industrial revolution, pre-World War I Italy, the reign of Germany's Third Reich and beyond. This innovative study combines theory and empirical data in questioning how and why states have established the exclusive right to authorize and regulate the movement of people.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The UIDAI estimated that only 25% of benefits reach PDS beneficiaries.
“the UIDAI estimated that only 25% of benefits reach PDS beneficiaries [96].”
From Seeing Like an Infrastructure: Low-resolution Citizens and the Aadhaar Identification Project (2021) · cites this paper as [96]
Cites
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brubaker, R. (2004) · Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Minority Rights · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489235.004 · Cited by 1,303 · see citing works
Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen
Isin, E. F. (2009) · Subjectivity · doi:10.1057/sub.2009.25 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
The Governance of Things: Documenting Limbo in the Greek Asylum Procedure
Cabot, H. (2012) · PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review · doi:10.1111/j.1555-2934.2012.01177.x · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-Sovereignty for Refugees? The Contested Horizons of Digital Identity
Cheesman, M. (2022) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Seeing Like an Infrastructure: Low-resolution Citizens and the Aadhaar Identification Project
Singh, R., & Jackson, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476056 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Ethnographic Refusal: Anthropological Need
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-004 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Indigenous Interruptions: Mohawk Nationhood, Citizenship, and the State
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-001
- Authors
- Torpey, J.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Corresponding author
- Torpey, John
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-11-13
- OpenAlex
- W2048832565
- Cited by
- 1,005
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › European Political History Analysis
- Keywords
- passports, citizenship, state recognition, migration control, border control, history of passports
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review