The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Crucible of Race: Black-White Relations in the American South Since Emancipation.
Abstract
This wide-ranging study examines the changing perceptions of blacks held by Southern whites and the consequences that those shifts had on the region's race relations. Joel Williamson, a native southerner and a historian whose career has been devoted toquestions of race, focuses on the years from 1877 to 1915. At the start of this period, says Williamson, a paternalistic, conservative mentality was the dominant white racial view. A holdover from the era of slavery, conservatism posited a hierarchical social order in which everyone, white as well as black, had a defined place. Conservatives viewed blacks as inherently inferior to whites and their place as subordinate to whites. But they regarded blacks as human· and saw a role for them in the South. In 1877, at the end of Reconstruction, Southern blacks were in fact subordinate to whites politically, economically, and socially. Conservatives were largely content with that status quo and had no desire to push blacks further down than they already were. Beginning in 1889, however, a racism emerged and flourished among Southern whites, and it represented a major tum for the worse in racial thought. To the radical mind, blacks were essentially bestial. Slavery had had a civilizing influence on the race, radicals believed, but with emancipation blacks had begun retrogressing to their natural state of savagery. The single most awful evidence of this decline for the radicals was a supposed increase in rapes of white women by black men. The black beast was a menace who had no place in the South, radicals argued, and at some undetermined future time the race would be eliminated from the region. Racial radicalism swept through the tum-of-the-century South with tremendous force, reaching its height between 1897 and 1907. In the grip of radical fear, whites became very aggressively antiblack, seeking ways to control the race as it deteriorated. The South witnessed a dramatic upsurge in the lynching of blacks, a
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History
Buck-Morss, S. (2009) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7zwbgz · Cited by 892
Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America
Smith, R. M. (1993) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2938735 · Cited by 687
Someone’s in the Garden with Eve: Race, Religion, and the American Fall
Stokes, M. B. (1998) · American Quarterly · doi:10.1353/aq.1998.0045 · Cited by 10
Campney, B. M. S. (2015) · Middle West Review · doi:10.1353/mwr.2015.0017
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolters, R., & Williamson, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Southern History
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-08
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450
- ISSN
- 0022-4642 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085459959
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Crucible of Race: Black-White Relations in the American South Since Emancipation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2209277
- The paper
- Wolters, R., & Williamson, J. (1985). The Crucible of Race: Black-White Relations in the American South Since Emancipation. The Journal of Southern History. https://doi.org/10.2307/2209277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.