Grief
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grief has significant cognitive content based on recognition of a specific loss and desire for a continued relationship with the loved one, and it is a moral emotion in the sense that a grieving person often thinks of themselves as morally bound to the memory of the loved one.
“Moreover, grief has a significant cognitive content in that it is based on the recognition of a specific loss and the desire for a continued relationship with the loved one (Gustafson, 1989;Ratcliffe, 2017).Also, it is a moral emotion in the sense that a grieving person often thinks of themselves as morally bound to the memory of the loved one (McCracken, 2005).”
From The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Gustafson, 1989
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 45
- Authors
- Gustafson, D.
- Corresponding author
- Gustafson, Donald
- Venue
- Noûs
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457
- ISSN
- 0029-4624 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4246899957
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- wa
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Noûs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- grief
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
