Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9,130

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

Bohm, David, Kuhn, Thomas S.·1964·The Philosophical Quarterly

Abstract

Journal Article Book Reviews Get access The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. By Thomas S. Kuhn. International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, Vol. II , No. 2. (Chicago and London : University of Chicago Press. 1962. Pp. xvi + 172. Price 22s 6d or $3.00). David Bohm David Bohm Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 14, Issue 57, October 1964, Pages 377–379, https://doi.org/10.2307/2217783 Published: 01 October 1964

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2217783

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 9,130

Metadata

Authors
Bohm, D., & Kuhn, T. S.
Venue
The Philosophical Quarterly
Published
1964-10
Volume
14
Issue
57
Pages
377
ISSN
0031-8094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752600643
Cited by
9,130
References
0
FWCI
36.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2217783
The paper
Bohm, D., & Kuhn, T. S. (1964). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The Philosophical Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217783

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.