The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability of Grazing Systems: An Application of Predator-Prey Graphs
Abstract
In a now classical paper, Rosenzweig & MacArthur (1963) have shown how the general stability properties of simple predator-prey systems can be studied by graphical techniques, supplemented by mathematical analysis of the behaviour near equilibrium points. A similar, graphical analysis of predation functions was suggested by Holling (1965). The stability analysis of predator and prey isoclines in the predator-prey 'phase diagram' has been discussed further by MacArthur & Connell (1966) and Rosenzweig (1969, 1971). The mathematical and graphical analysis of stability in predator-prey systems, and even three-trophic-levels systems, have been extended by Canale (1970), Rosenzweig (1973), Hubbell (1973), May (1971, 1972), Vandermeer (1973), Strebel & Goel (1973) and Maynard Smith & Slatkin (1973). Thus a considerable body of theory has been developed to deal with systems of populations at two or more trophic levels, or 'exploitation' systems (Rosenzweig 1973). So far only few attempts (Salt 1967; Maly 1969; McAllister, Le Brasseur & Parsons 1972) have been made to apply this theory to real ecological systems, whether by directing experiments or observations to test it, or even by comparing its predictions with existing data. Partly this slowness in application may have been due to the feeling that these theoretical models are still too simplified to be expected to apply directly to the manyspecies, variable-environment and spatially heterogeneous predator-prey systems found in nature. However, as pointed out by Rosenzweig (1973), scientific theory often starts by testing rather simple models, even of complex systems. Grazing systems used and controlled by man, from intensive pastures to extensive range, may be considered as a special case of'predator-prey' systems. Much of the theory was developed with explicit or implicit reference to two animal populations (e.g. Rosenzweig & MacArthur 1963; Holling 1965). But herbivore ('predator')-plant ('prey') interaction is sufficiently similar in its general features to make the same approach useful. Some important modifications are necessary, on the basis of biological considerations, but some results are directly transferable between predator-prey and herbivore-plant systems. Grazing systems have some advantages as relatively simple test cases for general ecological theories: the number of species is limited (usually only one herbivore, in some cases one or a few plant species), environmental heterogeneity within a system is often low and movement of animals is controlled. There is a large and increasing number of observations and experiments on pasture and range systems in many parts of the world. On the other hand, grazing systems are one of the types of ecosystems which are of greatest importance to man; if theoretical ecology could contribute to their understanding and to the solution of their practical management problems, this would be a very useful contribution indeed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density
Holling, C. S. (1966) · Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada · doi:10.4039/entm9848fv · Cited by 1,349
Cited by
Ecological Impacts of Deer Overabundance
Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C., & Waller, D. M. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105725 · Cited by 2,079
Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology
Suding, K. N., Gross, K. L., & Houseman, G. R. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.005 · Cited by 1,723
Alternative stable states in ecology
Beisner, B., Haydon, D., & Cuddington, K. (2003) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0376:assie]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,385
On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence
Connell, J. H., & Sousa, W. P. (1983) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284105 · Cited by 1,199
Stability of African Pastoral Ecosystems: Alternate Paradigms and Implications for Development
Ellis, J. E., & Swift, D. M. (1988) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3899515 · Cited by 1,157
Metadata
- Authors
- Noy-Meir, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 459
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2331238224
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of Grazing Systems: An Application of Predator-Prey Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2258730
- The paper
- Noy-Meir, I. (1975). Stability of Grazing Systems: An Application of Predator-Prey Graphs. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.