Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Investigation of the Biotic Factors Determining the Rates of Plant Decomposition on Blanket Bog

Coulson, J. C., Butterfield, Jennifer·1978·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

(1) The microbial and animal contributions to plant decomposition in peat and mineral soils in the northern Pennines were assessed by exposing litter of seven different plant species in nylon bags of two mesh sizes, one of which excluded all soil animals. (2) The average rate of microbial decomposition of the same substrates was similar at the peat and at the mineral sites, but the rates of decomposition of litter from different plant species showed large differences. (3) The role of animals in the decomposition of the plant materials differed markedly according both to the soil type and to the plant species of the substrate. Little of the decomposition of Eriophorum vaginatum and Sphagnum recurvum on peat soils was attributable to animal activity, whereas Calluna vulgaris and Rubus chamaemorus owed an appreciable part of their decomposition to the activity of soil animals. (4) The decomposition losses attributed to micro-organisms and to animals were not significantly correlated. (5) Significantly greater densities of soil animals were found on R. chamaemorus leaves that had been exposed on peat as compared with mineral soils, despite the much lower overall density of soil animals in peat soils. (6) The rates of microbial decomposition of the plant substrates were highly correlated with their P or N concentrations on both peat and mineral soils. When the animal contribution to decomposition was included, the high correlation with N or P was maintained on the mineral soils, but the correlation was lower and not significant on the peat. (7) The concentrations of N and P in the plants used were highly correlated. Their effects were separated by comparison between decomposition rates of litter derived from plants growing on areas fertilized with either N or P, and of litter of control material from the same plant species. The material enriched with N, but not that enriched with P, showed increased decomposition rates. (8) The addition of nitrogen fertilizer to blanket bog produced an increase in the density of soil invertebrates. It also caused increased larval growth in Tipula subnodicornis and Lasiocampa quercus, and increased fecundity in the former. Addition of a phosphorus fertilizer had less marked effects, but where these were significant they usually took the form of a decrease in density or in growth rate. (9) It is concluded that the chemical composition of a plant species is of paramount importance in determining the rate of its decomposition on blanket bog. Peat accumulation on blanket bog is primarily the result of the intrinsic slow decay rate of some of the species in the plant communities on such areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2259155

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Coulson, J. C., & Butterfield, J.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1978-07
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
631
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331113124
Cited by
257
References
5
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.