Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interactions of Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation in a Southern African Savanna

Knoop, W. T., Walker, B. H.·1985·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

The community on a more sandy soil was a broad-leaf woody savanna; the other was a more open microphyllous Acacia community. In the broad-leaf community the effect of the herbaceous vegetation on the woody plants is negligible. In the Acacia community with 7 times more herbaceous biomass, mature woody-plant growth was reduced by competition from the grass-dominated herb layer particularly in the wetter year. Grasses take up topsoil (0-30 cm) water sufficiently rapidly to reduce drainage into the subsoil (30-130 cm), and they also take up subsoil water directly, thus lowering the amount of subsoil water available to woody plants. -from Authors

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2259780

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Knoop, W. T., & Walker, B. H.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1985-03
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
235
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326522762
Cited by
523
References
0
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions of Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation in a Southern African Savanna. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2259780
The paper
Knoop, W. T., & Walker, B. H. (1985). Interactions of Woody and Herbaceous Vegetation in a Southern African Savanna. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259780

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.