The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pollination Relationships in Southern Spanish Mediterranean Shrublands
Abstract
(1) Pollination relationships were investigated for fourteen months in a southern Spanish Mediterranean coastal scrub community, composed of thirty plant species, at Reserva Biol6gica de Dofiana, Dofiana National Park. (2) Flowering encompassed the whole year, as did insect visits to flowers. Distinct seasonal changes, however, in both the number and identity of insect taxa, and in the number of plant species in bloom were apparent: maximum plant and insect richness occurred in spring. (3) Insect visitors mainly included small beetles, honeybees, small halictid bees, syrphids and bombylids. The overall species richness of the pollinator array was very high (187 taxa). (4) Plant species with specialized pollination mechanisms were relatively infrequent. Most plants had non-restrictive or small flowers, or both. Species relying on pollen to attract pollinators outweighed those relying on nectar as the main reward. (5) Joint analysis of flower attributes, blooming phenology and pollination vectors demonstrated that species flowering at about the same time of year tend to have their flowers visited by the same insects, irrespective of floral features. (6) It is hypothesized that fruit set is more resourcethan pollen-limited and that to achieve maximum fruit set most plants have unspecialized pollination relationships. The generalized nature of pollination systems may have been a major factor contributing to the survival and weedy behaviour of many Mediterranean scrub species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., & Tarrant, S. (2011) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x · Cited by 3,874
The modularity of pollination networks
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., & Jordano, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104 · Cited by 2,639
The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks
Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J., & Olesen, J. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1633576100 · Cited by 2,497
A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants
Larson, B. M. H., & Barrett, S. C. H. (2000) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.1999.0372 · Cited by 697
GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS
Olesen, J. M., & Jordano, P. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2416:gpippm]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Herrera, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 274
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321650730
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollination Relationships in Southern Spanish Mediterranean Shrublands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2260469
- The paper
- Herrera, J. (1988). Pollination Relationships in Southern Spanish Mediterranean Shrublands. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.