Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fine Root Dynamics in a Northern Hardwood Forest Ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH

Fahey, Timothy J., Hughes, Jeffrey W.·1994·The Journal of Ecology

Abstract

1 Patterns of fine root biomass, morphology, growth and longevity were examined in the northern hardwood zone of Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest to aid understanding of the role of roots in ecosystem function. 2 Fine root biomass in the mature hardwood forest was 471 gm-2 for < 2 mm roots in June 1987 and was concentrated in the surface soil, with 43% in the forest floor horizons. After clearcutting, fine root biomass accumulated rapidly in the regrowing forest, reaching 71 % of that in the mature forest after only four years of recovery. 3 Fine root diameter distributions and specific root length (SRL; length/mass) differed among species. SRL was higher in the forest floor than mineral soil horizons, and decreased with increasing root diameter. 4 Fine root production in the mature forest, measured with in-growth cores, averaged 254 g M-2 year1, but this method probably underestimated production. Rapid disappearance of fine roots was observed for roots growing through in situ screens, and these ephemeral roots are difficult to quantify. 5 The initiation of fine root growth in the forest floor was coincident with leaf expansion in the forest canopy; root growth in the mineral soil began 1-2 weeks later. Root growth was most rapid in early summer (mid-June to early July), and the lifespan of these early season roots averaged about 8-10 months across three years of study. This estimate of longevity was consistent with that obtained from the ratio of fine root biomass to production, after correcting the production value for the observed root disappearance from in situ screens (about 50% of fine roots disappeared from screens within an annual cycle). These longevity estimates also appeared to be consistent with an analysis of the soil C budget based upon soil and fine root respiration and total root allocation. Fine root production was apparently nearly twice as high as leaf production in this ecosystem. 6 These fine root production and turnover estimates are not consistent with results from previous studies of fine root decomposition, and we suggest that fine root decay has been underestimated because existing methods inhibit the saprotrophic activity of rhizosphere organisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2261262

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Fahey, T. J., & Hughes, J. W.
Venue
The Journal of Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-09
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
533
ISSN
0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331779461
Cited by
314
References
0
FWCI
16.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine Root Dynamics in a Northern Hardwood Forest Ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261262
The paper
Fahey, T. J., & Hughes, J. W. (1994). Fine Root Dynamics in a Northern Hardwood Forest Ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261262

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.