The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology.
Abstract
A framework for risk assessment. A probabilistic framework. Causes of Extinction. Summary. White rhinoceros on Ndumu. Formulating a birth-and death model. Parameters and initial condition. The deterministic prediction. Adding demographic stochasticity. Introducing a population ceiling. Removing constant numbers. Environmental variation. Risk Assessment. Summary. Useful methods when data are scarce. The Exonential model for population growth. Density dependence, the logistic equation and magpie geese. Other forms of density dependence. A model for suburban shrews. More about unstructured models. Summary. Structured populations. Age structure. The Leslie matrix. Stage structure. Simulating variability. Correlation and authocorrelation. Migration and dispersal. Density and dependence. Conclusion. Summary. Spatial structure and metapopulation dynamics. Conservation of spatial structure. Occupancy models. Population dynamic model. Summary. Conservation genetics. Consequences of loss of genetic diversity. Drift, risk and genetic diversity. The effects of inbreeding on population dynamics. Stochastic model for Banksia Cunteata. The genetics of metapopulations. Summary. Extensions of risk assessment. Appendices. Reference. Index. Conclusions. Random numbers. Random events and correlated random numbers. More about sensitivity analysis. References. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Systematic conservation planning
Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012251 · Cited by 4,631
Lande, R. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285580 · Cited by 2,143
Mutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations
Lynch, M., Conery, J., & Burger, R. (1995) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285812 · Cited by 1,049
Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity
Cabeza, M., & Moilanen, A. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02125-5 · Cited by 484
Modeling Stratified Diffusion in Biological Invasions
Shigesada, N., Kawasaki, K., & Takeda, Y. (1995) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285796 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, D. B. A., Burgman, M. A., Ferson, S., & Akcakaya, H. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 428
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043476850
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261313
- The paper
- Thompson, D. B. A., Burgman, M. A., Ferson, S., & Akcakaya, H. R. (1994). Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.