The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality and Recruitment Rate Evaluations in Heterogeneous Tropical Forests
Open accessAbstract
1 The methods commonly used to estimate stem turnover rates (i.e. mortality and recruitment) in species rich tropical forests suffer from a previously unrecognized artefact. The estimated rate is not independent of the census period. 2 An average rate estimate will decrease with time if the sample population cannot be characterized as homogeneous. This artefact may have considerable significance for comparisons between permanent plot studies that have used different census periods. 3 We present a theoretical consideration of this census effect. The artefact will be severe when a fraction of the population has a very much higher mortality rate than the average. 4 Using a simple formulation we provide a mathematical proof that rate estimates will decline with increasing census periods for all but perfectly uniform populations. 5 The phenomenon of apparent rate decrease may be used to provide ecologically significant information about the diversity and dynamics of the population as it is related to the variance of life expectancies within the sample. 6 Such an artefact complicates evaluation of change over nonstandard time intervals and requires careful and detailed attention. Similar problems will effect any estimation procedure which cannot account for all the rate variation within a study population. Recognition of the problem is a necessary first step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink
Brienen, R. J. W., Phillips, O. L., Feldpausch, T. R., Gloor, E., Baker, T. R., Lloyd, J., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Monteagudo-Mendoza, A., Malhi, Y., Lewis, S. L., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14283 · Cited by 1,211
Jennings, S. (1999) · Forestry · doi:10.1093/forestry/72.1.59 · Cited by 915
Drought–mortality relationships for tropical forests
Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G., Lewis, S. L., López‐González, G., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Lloyd, J., Malhi, Y., Monteagudo, A., Almeida, S., Dávila, E. A., et al. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03359.x · Cited by 616
Pattern and process in Amazon tree turnover, 1976–2001
Phillips, O. L., Baker, T. R., Arroyo, L., Higuchi, N., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, W. F., Lewis, S. L., Lloyd, J., Malhi, Y., Monteagudo, A., et al. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1438 · Cited by 482
Impact of severe drought associated with the 1997–1998 El Niño in a tropical forest in Sarawak
Nakagawa, M., Tanaka, K., Nakashizuka, T., Ohkubo, T., Kato, T., Maeda, T., Sato, K., Miguchi, H., Nagamasu, H., Ogino, K., et al. (2000) · Journal of Tropical Ecology · doi:10.1017/s0266467400001450 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheil, D., & May, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012462918
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality and Recruitment Rate Evaluations in Heterogeneous Tropical Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2261703
- The paper
- Sheil, D., & May, R. M. (1996). Mortality and Recruitment Rate Evaluations in Heterogeneous Tropical Forests. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.