The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dispersal Data and the Spread of Invading Organisms
Open accessAbstract
Models that describe the spread of invading organisms often assume that the dispersal distances of propagules are normally distributed. In contrast, measured dispersal curves are typically leptokurtic, not normal. In this paper, we consider a class of models, integrodifference equations, that directly incorporate detailed dispersal data as well as population growth dynamics. We provide explicit formulas for the speed of invasion for compensatory growth and for different choices of the propagule redistribution kernel and apply these formulas to the spread of D. pseudoobscura. We observe that: (1) the speed of invasion of a spreading population is extremely sensitive to the precise shape of the redistribution kernel and, in particular, to the tail of the distribution; (2) fat—tailed kernels can generate accelerating invasions rather than constant—speed travelling waves; (3) normal redistribution kernels (and by inference, many reaction—diffusion models) may grossly underestimate rates of spread of invading populations in comparison with models that incorporate more realistic leptokurtic distributions; and (4) the relative superiority of different redistribution kernels depends, in general, on the precise magnitude of the net reproductive rate. The addition of an Allee effect to an integrodifference equation may decrease the overall rate of spread. An Allee effect may also introduce a critical range; the population must surpass this spatial threshold in order to invade successfully. Fat—tailed kernels and Allee effects provide alternative explanations for the accelerating rates of spread observed for many invasions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The population biology of invasive species
Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R. J., Cohen, J. E., Ellstrand, N. C., et al. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037 · Cited by 3,912
Optimizing the success of random searches.
Viswanathan, G. M., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., da Luz, M. G. E., Raposo, E. P., & Stanley, H. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44831 · Cited by 1,359
Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants
Nathan, R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1124975 · Cited by 1,051
Explaining Leptokurtic Movement Distributions: Intrapopulation Variation in Boldness and Exploration
Fraser, D. F., Gilliam, J. F., Daley, M. J., Le, A. N., & Skalski, G. T. (2001) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/321307 · Cited by 658
Mogilner, A., & Edelstein-Keshet, L. (1999) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s002850050158 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Kot, M., Lewis, M. A., & van den Driessche, P.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2027-2042
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2003366965
- Cited by
- 1,486
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispersal Data and the Spread of Invading Organisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2265698
- The paper
- Kot, M., Lewis, M. A., & van den Driessche, P. (1996). Dispersal Data and the Spread of Invading Organisms. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.