Cited by 262Computability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsLogic, programming, and type systemssemigroups and automata theory

Computability and λ-definability

Turing, A. M.·1937·Journal of Symbolic Logic

Abstract

Several definitions have been given to express an exact meaning corresponding to the intuitive idea of ‘effective calculability’ as applied for instance to functions of positive integers. The purpose of the present paper is to show that the computable functions introduced by the author are identical with the λ-definable functions of Church and the general recursive functions due to Herbrand and Gödel and developed by Kleene. It is shown that every λ-definable function is computable and that every computable function is general recursive. There is a modified form of λ-definability, known as λ- K -definability, and it turns out to be natural to put the proof that every λ-definable function is computable in the form of a proof that every λ- K -definable function is computable; that every λ-definable function is λ- K -definable is trivial. If these results are taken in conjunction with an already available proof that every general recursive function is λ-definable we shall have the required equivalence of computability with λ-definability and incidentally a new proof of the equivalence of λ-definability and λ- K -definability. A definition of what is meant by a computable function cannot be given satisfactorily in a short space. I therefore refer the reader to Computable pp. 230–235 and p. 254. The proof that computability implies recursiveness requires no more knowledge of computable functions than the ideas underlying the definition: the technical details are recalled in §5.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2268280

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As Alan Turing proved in 1937, computers can perform an infinite variety of tasks, provided that the task can be codified as a series of steps.

    “As Alan Turing proved in 1937, such machines can perform an infinite variety of tasks, provided that the task can be codified as a series of steps”

    From Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs (2024) · cites this paper as Turing, 1937

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turing, A. M.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Turing, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Symbolic Logic
Published
1937-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
153-163
ISSN
  • 0022-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5886
OpenAlex
W1485161910
Cited by
262
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Symbolic Logic (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
Keywords
recursive functions, lambda-definability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review