Computability and λ-definability
Abstract
Several definitions have been given to express an exact meaning corresponding to the intuitive idea of ‘effective calculability’ as applied for instance to functions of positive integers. The purpose of the present paper is to show that the computable functions introduced by the author are identical with the λ-definable functions of Church and the general recursive functions due to Herbrand and Gödel and developed by Kleene. It is shown that every λ-definable function is computable and that every computable function is general recursive. There is a modified form of λ-definability, known as λ- K -definability, and it turns out to be natural to put the proof that every λ-definable function is computable in the form of a proof that every λ- K -definable function is computable; that every λ-definable function is λ- K -definable is trivial. If these results are taken in conjunction with an already available proof that every general recursive function is λ-definable we shall have the required equivalence of computability with λ-definability and incidentally a new proof of the equivalence of λ-definability and λ- K -definability. A definition of what is meant by a computable function cannot be given satisfactorily in a short space. I therefore refer the reader to Computable pp. 230–235 and p. 254. The proof that computability implies recursiveness requires no more knowledge of computable functions than the ideas underlying the definition: the technical details are recalled in §5.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As Alan Turing proved in 1937, computers can perform an infinite variety of tasks, provided that the task can be codified as a series of steps.
“As Alan Turing proved in 1937, such machines can perform an infinite variety of tasks, provided that the task can be codified as a series of steps”
From Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs (2024) · cites this paper as Turing, 1937
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs
Autor, D. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32140 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness
Findlay, G., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., David, I., Mayner, W. G., Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04571 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Turing completeness can be achieved using radically different substrates [72–75], whether simple [46, 76] or complex, feedfor-ward [77] or recurrent [78, 79].”
- Authors
- Turing, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Turing, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Symbolic Logic
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1937-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 0022-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5886
- OpenAlex
- W1485161910
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Symbolic Logic (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
- Keywords
- recursive functions, lambda-definability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review