The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Games and full completeness for multiplicative linear logic
Abstract
We present a game semantics for Linear Logic, in which formulas denote games and proofs denote winning strategies. We show that our semantics yields a categorical model of Linear Logic and prove full completeness for Multiplicative Linear Logic with the MIX rule: every winning strategy is the denotation of a unique cut-free proof net. A key role is played by the notion of history-free strategy; strong connections are made between history-free strategies and the Geometry of Interaction. Our semantics incorporates a natural notion of polarity, leading to a refined treatment of the additives. We make comparisons with related work by Joyal, Blass, et al.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This strong connection comes out even very forcefully in the 'full completeness' theorems of Abramsky & Jagadeesan 1994, which do not just link provability to validity, but specific proofs to concrete objects in (category-theoretic) semantics.”
From THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Abramsky & Jagadeesan 1994
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1090/conm/092/1003210 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3975(77)90044-5 · DOI
- Lafont, 1991, Proceedings of the sixth annual symposium on logic in computer science, 43
- Lafont, 1990, Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM symposium on principles of programming languages, 95
- Joyal, 1977, Remarques sur la theorie des jeux a deux personnes, Gazette des sciences mathematiques du Quebec, 1
- 10.1007/BFb0040266 · DOI
- Hoare, 1985, Communicating sequential processes
- Girard, 1989, Logic Colloquium 88, 221
- Gonthier, 1992, Proceedings of the seventh symposium on logic in computer science, 223
- Freyd, 1990, Categories, allegories, 39
- 10.1016/0304-3975(90)90151-7 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0960129500001274 · DOI
- Abramsky, 1992, Proceedings of the seventh symposium on logic in computer science, 211
- 10.1090/conm/092/1003194 · DOI
- 10.1090/conm/092/1003197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0960129500000189 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3975(86)90044-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/BFb0064579 · DOI
- Coquand, 1987, Third workshop on the mathematical foundations of programming language semantics, 344
- 10.1016/0168-0072(92)90073-9 · DOI
- Abramsky, 1991, Proofs as processes
- 10.1017/S0960129500001328 · DOI
- Berry, 1985, Theory and practice of sequential algorithms: the kernel of the applicative language CDS, Algebraic semantics, 35
- 10.1016/0304-3975(93)90181-R · DOI
- 10.1007/3-540-56287-7_113 · DOI
- Girard, 1988, International Conference on Computer Logic, COLOG 88, 417, 76
- 10.4064/fm-77-2-151-166 · DOI
- Abramsky S. , A strong completeness theorem for multiplicative linear logic: Preliminary announcement, E-mail communication on types mailing list, 1992. · DOI
- Jacobs B. , Semantics of weakening and contraction, 1992, preprint.
- Blute, 1992, Linear logic, coherence, and dinaturality
- Milner, 1975, Logic colloquium, Bristol 1973, 157
- 10.1007/BF01622878 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3975(87)90045-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Conway, 1976, volume 6 of London Mathematical Society Monographs, 6
- Davey, 1990, Introduction to lattices and order
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION
van Benthem, J., & Martinez, M. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50012-1 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Abramsky, S., & Jagadeesan, R.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Symbolic Logic
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 543-574
- ISSN
- 0022-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5886
- OpenAlex
- W2094685149
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 23.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Symbolic Logic (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Keywords
- game semantics, linear logic, multiplicative linear logic, winning strategies, categorical models, geometry of interaction, polarity, additives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review