The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Bayes Factors
Abstract
In a 1935 paper and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece was a number, now called the Bayes factor, which is the posterior odds of the null hypothesis when the prior probability on the null is one-half. Although there has been much discussion of Bayesian hypothesis testing in the context of criticism of P-values, less attention has been given to the Bayes factor as a practical tool of applied statistics. In this article we review and discuss the uses of Bayes factors in the context of five scientific applications in genetics, sports, ecology, sociology, and psychology. We emphasize the following points: •From Jeffreys' Bayesian viewpoint, the purpose of hypothesis testing is to evaluate the evidence in favor of a scientific theory.•Bayes factors offer a way of evaluating evidence in favor of a null hypothesis.•Bayes factors provide a way of incorporating external information into the evaluation of evidence about a hypothesis.•Bayes factors are very general and do not require alternative models to be nested.•Several techniques are available for computing Bayes factors, including asymptotic approximations that are easy to compute using the output from standard packages that maximize likelihoods.•In “nonstandard” statistical models that do not satisfy common regularity conditions, it can be technically simpler to calculate Bayes factors than to derive non-Bayesian significance tests.•The Schwarz criterion (or BIC) gives a rough approximation to the logarithm of the Bayes factor, which is easy to use and does not require evaluation of prior distributions.•When one is interested in estimation or prediction, Bayes factors may be converted to weights to be attached to various models so that a composite estimate or prediction may be obtained that takes account of structural or model uncertainty.•Algorithms have been proposed that allow model uncertainty to be taken into account when the class of models initially considered is very large.•Bayes factors are useful for guiding an evolutionary model-building process.•It is important, and feasible, to assess the sensitivity of conclusions to the prior distributions used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Self-citationBayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
AIC model selection using Akaike weights
Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03206482 · Cited by 2,684
Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics
Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · Cited by 2,530
Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation
Friston, K., Mattout, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Ashburner, J., & Penny, W. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.035 · Cited by 880
Metadata
- Authors
- Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Published
- 1995-06-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 430
- Pages
- 773-773
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255582690
- Cited by
- 2,312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayes Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2291091
- The paper
- Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.