Cited by 1,568Fiscal Policies and Political EconomyFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthPolitics, Economics, and Education Policy

A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt

Open access
Alesina, Alberto, Tabellini, Guido·1990·The Review of Economic Studies

Abstract

This paper considers an economy in which policymakers with different preferences alternate in office as a result of elections. Government debt is used strategically by each policymaker to influence the choices of his successors. If different policymakers disagree about the desired composition of government spending between two public goods, the economy exhibits a deficits bias; that is, debt accumulation is higher than it would be with a social planner. The equilibrium level of debt is larger the larger is the degree of polarization between alternating governments and the less likely it is that the current government will be re-elected.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2298021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patronage politics can have an intertemporal dimension, with the current government spending heavily on its favored group and passing on too little capital or too high levels of debt to the next government.

    “This distortion can have an intertemporal dimension, with the current government spending heavily on its favored group and passing on too little capital (or too high levels of debt) to the next government (Alesina and Tabellini 1990;Alesina and Drazen 1991).”

    From Using Natural Resources for Development: Why Has It Proven So Difficult? (2016) · cites this paper as Alesina and Tabellini 1990

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Alesina, Alberto (1986) "Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters" mimeo. ___________ (1987) "Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game" Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
  2. Barro, Robert (1919) "On the Determination of the Public Debt" Journal of Political Economy, 87, 940-7.
  3. U.S. Deficits since World War I" the Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88, 193-222.
  4. ___________ (1987) "Macroeconomics" John Wiley and Sons, New York 2nd Edition.
  5. Becker, Gary, (1985) "Public Policies, Pressure Groups and Deadweights Costs" Journal of Public Economics, 28, 329-41.
  6. Brennan, Geoffrey and James Buchanan (1980) "The Power to Tax" Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  7. Brock, William and Stephen Turnovsky (1980) "Time Consistency and Optimal Government Policy in a Perfect Foresight Equilibrium" Journal of Public Economics, 13, 183-212.
  8. Buchanan, James and Richard Wagner (1977) "Democracy in Deficit" Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
  9. Cameron, David (1978) "The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis" American Political Science Review, 12, 1243-61.
  10. l-fildenbrand, 4ernes (1974) "Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy" Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
  11. Lindbeck, Assar (1985) "Redistribution Policy and the Expansion of the Public Sector" Journal of Public Economics, 28, 3019-28.
  12. Lindberg, Leon and Charles Maier (1985) (ed.) "The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation" Brookings Institution, Washington.
  13. Lucas, Robert (1986) "Principles of Fiscal and Monetary Policy" Journal of Monetary Economics, January.
  14. Lucas, Robert and Nancy Stokey (1983) "Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy in an Economy without Capital" Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 55-93.
  15. Meltzer, Allan and Scott Richard (1981) "A Rational Theory of the Size of Government" Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914-27.
  16. Mueller, Dennis (1979) "Public Choice" Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England.
  17. Persson, Torsten and Lars Svennson Government Cash-Flow" Journal (1984) "Time-Consistent Fiscal Policy and of Monetary Economics, 14, 365-14.
  18. Rogers, Carol (1986a) "The Effects of Distributive Goals on the Time- Inconsistency of Optimal Taxes" Journal of Monetary Economics, 11, 251- 69.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G.
Affiliations
Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
Venue
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
1990-07
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
403
ISSN
0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2249081876
Cited by
1,568
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 59
FWCI
31.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
Keywords
budget deficit, public debt, political polarization, electoral incentives, public goods, political economy of fiscal policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review