Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 759

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Signal Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions1

Wells, John D., Valacich, Joseph S., Hess, Traci J.·2011·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

An electronic commerce marketing channel is fully mediated by information technology, stripping away much of a product’s physical informational cues, and creating information asymmetries (i.e., limited information). These asymmetries may impede consumers’ ability to effectively assess certain types of products, thus creating challenges for online sellers. Signaling theory provides a framework for understanding how extrinsic cues— signals—can be used by sellers to convey product quality information to consumers, reducing uncertainty and facilitating a purchase or exchange. This research proposes a model to investigate website quality as a potential signal of product quality and consider the moderating effects of product information asymmetries and signal credibility. Three experiments are reported that examine the efficacy of signaling theory as a basis for predicting online consumer behavior with an experience good. The results indicate that website quality influences consumers’ perceptions of product quality, which subsequently affects online purchase intentions. Additionally, website quality was found to have a greater influence on perceived product quality when consumers had higher information asymmetries. Likewise, signal credibility was found to strengthen the relationship between website quality and product quality perceptions for a high quality website. Implications for future research and website design are examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/23044048

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ajzen, 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
  2. Chatterjee, 2002, Communicating Quality through Signals and Substantive Messages: The Effect of Supporting Information and Need for Cognition, Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 228
  3. Cox, 1967, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior
  4. Dawar, 1994, Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality, Journal of Marketing, 58, 81
  5. Dodds, 1991, Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307
  6. Garvin, 1987, Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality, Harvard Business Review, 65, 101
  7. Gefen, 2000, Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice, Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), 4, 1
  8. Gordon, 1986, The ’Science of the Sophomore’ Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism, Academy of Management Review, 11, 191
  9. Nunnally, 1967, Psychometric Theory
  10. Pallud, 2008, A User-Centered Perspective on IT and Museums
  11. Reichheld, 2000, E-Loyalty: Your Secret Weapon on the Web, Harvard Business Review, 78, 105
  12. Robbins, 1986, Callable Bonds: A Rick-Reducing Signaling Mechanism, The Journal of Finance, 41, 935
  13. Rose, 2001, The Effect of Download Time on Consumer Attitude toward the E-Service Retailer, e-Services Journal, 1, 55
  14. Yoo, 2001, Developing a Scale to Measure the Perceived Quality of an Internet Shopping Site (Sitequal), Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2, 31

Cited by

See all 759

Metadata

Authors
Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., & Hess, T. J.
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
373-A18
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W3149048782
Cited by
759
References
98
FWCI
45.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Signal Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/23044048
The paper
Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., & Hess, T. J. (2011). What Signal Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions1. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.