Cited by 362AI in Service InteractionsDigital Marketing and Social MediaCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

AI-powered chatbot communication with customers: Dialogic interactions, satisfaction, engagement, and customer behavior

Jiang, Hua, Cheng, Yang, Yang, Jeongwon, Gao, Shanbing·2022·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107329

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, H., Cheng, Y., Yang, J., & Gao, S.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Shanbing
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
134
Pages
107329
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280628993
Cited by
362
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 5
FWCI
20.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
chatbots, customer satisfaction, social media engagement, purchase intention, price premium, responsiveness, conversational tone, dialogic communication, social exchange theory, resource exchange theory, consumer behavior, mediation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review