The DOI matches its Crossref record.
6178
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other well-established formats that have been linked with modeling information flow are logic programming and resolution theorem proving (cf. Kowalski 1979), Doets 1994), and more general unification-based inferential mechanisms (cf. Rounds 1997).”
From THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Kowalski 1979
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION
van Benthem, J., & Martinez, M. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50012-1 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Kowalski, R., & Nijenhuis, A.
- Venue
- The American Mathematical Monthly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1979-05-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 399
- ISSN
- 0002-9890 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4245237478
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Mathematical Monthly (publishedVersion)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
