The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Robust classification for imprecise environments
Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007601015854 · Cited by 1,250
Zhang, H., & Maloney, L. T. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00001 · Cited by 679
On the Consistency of Bayes Estimates
Diaconis, P., & Freedman, D. (1986) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176349830 · Cited by 608
The Comparison and Evaluation of Forecasters
DeGroot, M. H., & Fienberg, S. E. (1983) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2987588 · Cited by 604
Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity
Shalizi, C. R., & Crutchfield, J. P. (2001) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1010388907793 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Vajda, S., Blackwell, D., & Girshick, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1955
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102
- ISSN
- 0035-9238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059944969
- Cited by
- 1,032
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2342525
- The paper
- Vajda, S., Blackwell, D., & Girshick, M. A. (1955). Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). https://doi.org/10.2307/2342525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
