The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies in Mathematical Learning Theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning and memorization of classifications.
Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093825 · Cited by 817
A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014420 · Cited by 726
The choice axiom after twenty years
Luce, R. D. (1977) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90032-3 · Cited by 554
Best News Yet on the Six-Factor Model of Well-Being
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.01.002 · Cited by 551
An Economist’s Perspective on Probability Matching
Vulkan, N. (2000) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00106 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, M., Bush, R. R., & Estes, W. K.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1960
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202
- ISSN
- 0035-9238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015967271
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies in Mathematical Learning Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2342659
- The paper
- Stone, M., Bush, R. R., & Estes, W. K. (1960). Studies in Mathematical Learning Theory. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). https://doi.org/10.2307/2342659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
