Cited by 726Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall

Open access
Polyn, Sean M., Norman, Kenneth A., Kahana, Michael J.·2009·Psychological Review

Abstract

The authors present the context maintenance and retrieval (CMR) model of memory search, a generalized version of the temporal context model of M. W. Howard and M. J. Kahana (2002a), which proposes that memory search is driven by an internally maintained context representation composed of stimulus-related and source-related features. In the CMR model, organizational effects (the tendency for related items to cluster during the recall sequence) arise as a consequence of associations between active context elements and features of the studied material. Semantic clustering is due to longstanding context-to-item associations, whereas temporal clustering and source clustering are both due to associations formed during the study episode. A behavioral investigation of the three forms of organization provides data to constrain the CMR model, revealing interactions between the organizational factors. Finally, the authors discuss the implications of CMR for their understanding of a broad class of episodic memory phenomena and suggest ways in which this theory may guide exploration of the neural correlates of memory search.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0014420

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing consolidation and recall models take the memory system's input to be discrete items that are remembered one by one.

    “Most extant models of memory consolidation (McClelland et al., 1995) and recall (Polyn, Norman, & Kahana, 2009) have been formulated under the assumption that the input to the memory system is a series of discrete items to be remembered.”

    From Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory (2017) · cites this paper as Polyn, Norman, & Kahana, 2009

  • The temporal context framework can explain boundary effects on memory by positing a rapid rise in drift rate.

    “Within the temporal context framework, an abrupt increase in contextual drift rate can explain boundary effects on memory [37], but what might drive this increase?”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baddeley AD Working memory 1986 Clarendon Press Oxford, England
  2. Friendly M Methods for finding graphic representations of associative memory structures Memory organization and structure 1979 85 129 Academic Press New York
  3. Polyn SM Neuroimaging, behavioral, and computational investigations of memory targeting 2005 Princeton University Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  4. Puff CR Puff CR Memory organization research and theory: The state of the art Memory organization and structure 1979 3 17 Academic Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2009
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
129-156
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2077011549
Cited by
726
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH078513, MH069456, MH055687)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH062196)
  • Dana Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
memory search, free recall, semantic clustering, temporal clustering, source clustering, episodic memory
MeSH terms
Association Learning, Attention, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Semantics, Serial Learning, Verbal Learning, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review