The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples
Abstract
SUMMARY Shapiro and Wilk's (1965) W statistic arguably provides the best omnibus test of normality, but is currently limited to sample sizes between 3 and 50. Wis extended up to n = 2000 and an approximate normalizing transformation suitable for computer implementation is given. A novel application of Win transforming data to normality is suggested, using the three-parameter lognormal as an example. RESEARCH into tests of non-normality was given new impetus with the introduction of the so- called analysis of variance test by Shapiro and Wilk (1965). The test statistic Wwas constructed by considering the regression of ordered sample values on corresponding expected normal order statistics, which for a sample from a normally distributed population is linear; Wwas obtained as an F-ratio from generalized least-squares analysis to judge the adequacy of the linear fit. Percentage points of the null distribution of Wwere tabulated for p = 0 01, 002, 005, 0 1, 0 5, 0-9, 0 95, 0 98 and 0 99, for sample sizes n = 3 (1) 50. A normalizing transformation for Wusing a Johnson SB approximation in the region n = 7(1)50 was later proposed (Shapiro and Wilk, 1968), though tables were still required for n = 4(1) 6. Extensive empirical comparisons of Wwith other tests of non-normality using computer- generated pseudo-random numbers indicated that W had good power properties against a wide range of alternative distributions, and was therefore truly an omnibus test (Shapiro et al., 1968). Subsequently, other statistics of the Wtype, namely Y(D'Agostino, 1971), W' (Shapiro and Francia, 1972) and r (Filliben, 1975), were developed and shown to have power properties broadly comparable with those of W Another approach was to combine ,lb and b2, the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
Cited by
A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals
Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1403192 · Cited by 3,179
Comparisons of various types of normality tests
Yap, B. W., & Sim, C. H. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/00949655.2010.520163 · Cited by 897
A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality
Henze, N., & Zirkler, B. (1990) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929008830400 · Cited by 710
Pronovost, P. J. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.14.1310 · Cited by 688
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Royston, J. P.
- Venue
- Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115
- ISSN
- 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1543298386
- Cited by
- 1,399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2347973
- The paper
- Royston, J. P. (1982). An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples. Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.