Strategies of Seed Dispersal and Seed Predation in Amazonian Ungulates
Abstract
Amazonian ungulates, which include the red brocket deer, grey brocket deer, collared peccary, white-lipped peccary, and lowland tapir, consume large quantities of fruit and maximize nutritional gain by exploiting both pulp and seed. Amazonian ungulates often disperse seeds over short distances by spitting them out during mastication. The lowland tapir is the only ungulate that frequently disperses intact seeds through the digestive tract. Brocket deer destroy most of the seeds they consume by digesting them with rumen microbes, while peccaries crack seeds using their resistant teeth, strong jaw musdes, and thick skull bones. Defensive strategies of seeds include strength, chemical toxins, mast fruiting, fibrous lignin, and size variation. Brocket deer and peccaries have pregastric fermentation that may detoxify some secondary compounds of seeds. Small seeds occasionally pass intact through brocket deer and peccary guts. However, strong palm seeds that avert many mammalian predators are often destroyed by ungulates. The fibrous lignin that protects seeds of Jessenia bataua (Palmae) appears to be effective against ungulates which may explain its abundance in the study area. AMAZONIAN UNGULATES CONSUME large quantities of fruit. Fruit constitutes 81 percent of the diet of red brocket deer (Mazama americana), 87 percent of grey brocket deer (M. gouazoubira), 59 percent of collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu), 66 percent of white-lipped peccary (T. pecarn) (Bodmer 1989) and 33 percen…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tapirs, peccaries, wild pigs, deer, duikers and larger rodents are among the most active seed dispersers or predators; a significant change in their population densities will have a major effect on seedling survival and forest regeneration.
“Tapirs, peccaries, wild pigs, deer, duikers and the larger rodents are among the most active seed dispersers or predators; thus a significant change in their population densities will have a major effect on seedling survival and forest regeneration (Beck 2005, Bodmer 1991, Fragoso 1997).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Bodmer 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bodmer, R. E.
- Corresponding author
- Bodmer, Richard E.
- ORCID
- Bodmer, Richard E.
- Venue
- Biotropica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255
- ISSN
- 0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2331939243
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotropica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- seed dispersal, seed predation, red brocket deer, collared peccary, white-lipped peccary, Tapirus terrestris, mast fruiting, lignin, seed size variation, seed dormancy, seed germination, fruit consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review