Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geographical Variation in Fertility, Phenology, and Composition of the Understory of Neotropical Forests

Gentry, A. H., Emmons, L. H.·1987·Biotropica

Abstract

We compare levels of flowering and fruiting in 55 samples of Neotropical forest understory from 13 sites in 6 countries. Each sample consists of a census of fertile understory plants along a transect. Changes in species richness and density of fertile understory plants are correlated with rainfall and soil fertility. Areas with weak (or no) dry seasons and intermediate to rich soils average 64 fertile plant species and 174 individuals per sample, whereas areas with poor soil and a strong dry season average only 5 fertile species and 8 fertile individuals. Areas with either strong dry seasons and good soils or weak dry seasons and very poor soils have intermediate values. Taxonomic composition of the understory also changes predictably with rainfall and soil fertility. In increasingly stressed forests changes are found in understory structure, with sequential loss of terrestrial herbs, epiphytes, understory shrubs, and lianas. The understory of the poorest soil site consists almost entirely of young trees. The effects of seasonal differences at a given site are small compared with between-site differences. We suggest that the level of understory fertility may provide a simple indicator of overall ecosystem productivity. THE UNDERSTORY OF A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST iS composed of a different set of species than is the canopy. The understory, though often neglected, is an integral and important part of the plant community. For example, understory species constitute 25 percent of the species and 24 percent of the individuals sampled in 1000 m2 at a wet-forest site in western Ecuador (Gentry and Dodson 1987). In a coastal Ecuador moist forest, 2 1 percent of the species and 44 percent of the individuals in a similar sample are restricted to the understory. The importance of understory plants is evident from local species lists: 46 percent of the Rio Palenque species (Dodson and Gentry 1978), 43 percent of the Barro Colorado Island, Panama species (Croat 1978), and 47 percent of the Jauneche (Dodson et al. 1985) species are herbs, shrubs, and small trees. These figures are overestimates, since a number of the species included in such lists are weedy and found rarely, if at all, inside the closed forest, but the overall importance of the understory to rainforest plant diversity is clear. The understory supports a different fauna than does the canopy. Many species of insects, birds, and mammals are restricted to the understory, and understory plants are major food sources for this biota. For example, hermit hummingbirds, major pollinators for many plant taxa, are exclusively understory birds. Such frugivores as birds of the family Pipridae and bats of the genus Carollia are largely dependent on understory fruits (e.g., Snow 1965, Stiles 1981, Fleming 1985). Temperate zone studies have shown that response of the forest understory to environmental gradients can differ from that of the canopy (summary in Whittaker 1977). For the tropics, we now have data that show predictable patterns of change in plant community composition across such environmental gradients as annual precipitation (Gentry 1982a, 1987, in press). Surprisingly little attention has been focused on the easily accessible understory, and few data are available for comparing the structure or floristic composition of the rainforest understory in differ-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2388339

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Gentry, A. H., & Emmons, L. H.
Venue
Biotropica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-09
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
216
ISSN
0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968204671
Cited by
277
References
7
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographical Variation in Fertility, Phenology, and Composition of the Understory of Neotropical Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2388339
The paper
Gentry, A. H., & Emmons, L. H. (1987). Geographical Variation in Fertility, Phenology, and Composition of the Understory of Neotropical Forests. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.