Cited by 50Crustacean biology and ecologyAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesIsotope Analysis in Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Food Quality on Isopod Population Dynamics

Rushton, S. P., Hassall, M.·1987·Functional Ecology

Abstract

1 Growth and survival of juvenile Armadillidium vulgare (Latrielle) in the laboratory were greatest on a diet of an excess of freshly fallen leaves from dicotyledonous plants but decreased with decreasing supply of this food, even though alternative lower quality foods were provided in excess. Growth in the laboratory was positively related to temperature but mortality was not clearly related to temperature over the range observed in the field. 2 Growth and survivorship of a field population on a Breckland grass heath are described for a 2-year period during which density declined from 673m-2 to 102 m-2. The demand for high-quality food by the field population peaked during a period of rapid growth in spring and early summer when supply of leaf litter from dicotyledonous plants was at a minimum. Litter production peaked in autumn after isopods had finished breeding and when low temperatures reduced their consumption rates. 3 Competition for high-quality food in spring and early summer during this period could have reduced growth and survivorship sufficiently to account for the observed decline in population density. 4 A simulation model, based on laboratory observations, closely predicted the observed decline in the field population. Further simulations also predicted the higher population densities observed in the field before this study and also the lower equilibrium densities found on the site since the study. Key-words: Population dynamics, competition, food quality, woodlouse, Armadillidium vulgare, densitydependence, growth, survivorship, consumption * Present address: Dr S.P. Rushton, Department of Agricultural Biology, The University, Newcastle-uponTyne NEl 7RU, UK. Introduction The role of food quality in the population dynamics of herbivores has been intensively studied and its importance in limiting populations widely recognized (Lawton & McNeil, 1979; Crawley, 1983; Dempster, 1983). In contrast, the influence of food quality on the population dynamics of decomposers has received little attention. As most decomposers have a broad range of diet and dead organic material is relatively abundant in most ecosystems, it is often assumed that detrivores are surrounded by an abundance of suitable food. For this reason Warburg, Linsenmair & Bercovitz (1984), in a comprehensive review, suggest that food is not important in influencing population fluctuations of terrestrial isopods; instead they propose that the dynamics of isopod populations are primarily controlled by climatic variables, such as temperature and humidity, since these strongly affect growth, survivorship and reproduction of isopods. Growth and survivorship are also importantly influenced by food quality, as demonstrated for Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) by Cromack (1967) and Merriam (1971). The quality of isopod foods in the field shows much variation (Hassall & Rushton, 1984) but this would not limit isopod populations if optimal quality foods were always present in excess. However, populations could be adversely affected by either a shortage of the best quality foods or by a temporal separation in supply and demand of optimal food as is the case for herbivores in the African savannah (Sinclair,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2389792

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rushton, S. P., & Hassall, M.
Venue
Functional Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
359
ISSN
0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979964547
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Functional Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
terrestrial isopods, food quality, population dynamics, density dependence, competition (biology), leaf litter, dicotyledonous plants, temperature effects, population decline (ecology), computer simulation, decomposers, Breckland, population density fluctuations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review