The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some Consequences of Crisis Which Limit the Viability of Organizations
Abstract
This paper proposes that crisis can be denoted with a specific meaning applicable to organizational behavior. A tentative series of interrelated propositions suggests how a crisis in an organization's external environment can activate behavior within the organization which hinders its response to the crisis. The propositions are illustrated with material from a range of political and nonpolitical studies. Some attention is directed to possible means of making the eight principal variables operational.' Charles F. Hermann is a doctoral candidate in the International Relations Program of Northwestern University's Political Science Department.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027
“Crisis serves as an umbrella term for these kinds of unexpected events (Hermann 1963; Smart and Vertinsky 1984; Herbane 2010). three successive resilience stages (anticipation, coping, and adaptation) and assign important organizational capabilities to each of these stages.”
BackgroundOrganizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192960 · Cited by 1,534
Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity
Gilbert, C. G. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803920 · Cited by 1,375
The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure
Boin, A., 't Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490880 · Cited by 932
Designs for Crisis Decision Units
Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392406 · Cited by 323
A Blessing and a Curse: How CEOs’ Trait Empathy Affects Their Management of Organizational Crises
König, A., Graf-Vlachy, L., Bundy, J., & Little, L. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0387 · Cited by 237
Heverin, T., & Zach, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21685 · Cited by 209
Gkeredakis, M., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Barrett, M. (2021) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100344 · Cited by 173
Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis
Shahbazi, M., & Bunker, D. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102780 · Cited by 126
Harnessing the Power of Self-Organization in an Online Community During Organizational Crisis1
Nan, N., & Lu, Y. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.09 · Cited by 107
Organizational Contexts and Contingent Leadership Roles: A Theoretical Exploration
Egglestonl, K. K., & Bhagat, R. S. (1993) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679304601002 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hermann, C. F.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1963-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333610989
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
